|
I’ve spent the last quarter evaluating different legacy enterprise system modernization firms for a large modernization initiative, and I wanted to share the process because reading other people’s real experiences helped me a lot. Maybe this will help someone who’s now going through the same chaos of vendor pitches, audits, and contradictory estimates. Background: What Needed ModernizationOur system: 17-year-old monolithic application Mostly Java + outdated Spring + Oracle DB ~2.1M lines of code Average feature deployment: 12–18 days Yearly maintenance cost rising by ~14% Downtime: 10–13 hours per year
Business was pushing for faster releases and better stability, so the only real option was a structured legacy application modernization with a move toward modular architecture. At first, I looked at 8 different legacy enterprise system modernization firms. Almost all of them sounded great on the surface — slick decks, impressive claims, big promises. But when I started asking specific questions, the differences became obvious. Here’s the checklist I used: Past modernization cases with systems older than 10 years Ability to handle large monolith decomposition Transparency in cost and timeline A realistic migration path (not “rewrite everything in 6 months”) Clear risk mitigation strategy Ability to work with partial or outdated documentation Engineering depth, not just top-level consulting
Why Zoolatech Became My Final Choice1. They provided a real technical audit, not a PowerPoint pitchWhile most vendors provided 10–15 slide overviews, Zoolatech spent two weeks doing an assessment and delivered: 62-page audit report code complexity metrics dependency mapping across 40+ modules DB analysis identifying 11 high-risk cross-schema dependencies migration plan split into 3 phases and 19 milestones
This was the first time a vendor actually showed understanding of our system’s real structure. 2. They gave realistic numbers instead of optimistic onesA few firms claimed they could do the full modernization in 6–9 months. That’s basically impossible at our scale. Zoolatech estimated: 13–15 months full modernization 20–25% reduction in maintenance costs in the first year post-migration 30–45% performance improvement after decomposing the first set of services 40% reduction in deployment time after CI/CD restructuring
These numbers felt grounded, not marketing-driven. 3. They showed the actual people who would work on the projectThis was a big one. Zoolatech showed a detailed team structure: 2 solution architects 5 senior engineers 2 QA specialists 1 delivery manager
Other vendors were vague — “a senior team,” “we’ll assign experts,” etc. I wanted clarity, not placeholders. 4. They asked the right business questions, not only technical onesThis surprised me in a good way.
Some of the questions: Which modules generate the highest revenue impact? Which workflows are most sensitive to downtime? Which parts of the system change most frequently? Where does technical debt cause the highest financial loss?
This told me they weren’t planning to modernize blindly — they wanted modernization aligned with business value, not just refactoring for the sake of refactoring. Key Questions I Asked During Vendor EvaluationIf you’re choosing between modernization providers, these questions helped me separate real experts from overconfident sales teams: What is your rollback strategy during phased migration? Can you provide specific modernization metrics from a past project (before/after)? How do you ensure business continuity while migrating critical modules? What percentage of the migration can run parallel to feature development? How do you handle mixed technology stacks and outdated components? What is your approach to database modernization during service extraction?
Zoolatech was the only vendor that had structured, detailed answers for every one of these. Final ReasoningI chose Zoolatech because they showed: technical depth, realistic expectations, transparency about risks, real engineering talent (not just sales), and a modernization plan that actually matched our scale and complexity.
So far, 3 months in, they are hitting milestones exactly as planned — which is rare for projects like this. | 
Show IP Card
Radar Card
Published in 
Bump Card
Stick Card
Silent card
Open Thread Card
Highlighter card
Jack
Anonimous Post