View: 212|Reply: 2

Combining Different Formats

[Copy link]

54

threads

262

posts

906

credits

Senior member

Rank: 4

credits
906
Published in 2025-9-23 02:01:45 | Show all floors |Read mode
When I first started experimenting with online sessions, I went fully live because I thought that was the only way to keep people engaged. Later I heard about automated webinars and realized they could save time, but I don’t want to give up the interaction completely. It made me wonder if it’s possible to combine both styles in a single project so I get the best of each approach. Has anyone tried that blend before?

96

threads

265

posts

922

credits

Senior member

Rank: 4

credits
922
Published in 2025-9-24 02:26:57 | Show all floors
Yes, I’ve done a mix, and it worked better than I expected. The automated ones gave me consistency since people could watch at convenient times, while the live sessions added that personal touch. I used prerecorded content during some events and then joined live for Q&A. Having the right webinar tools from sites like helped, because they gave options to structure the timing and switch between formats without confusing participants. It created a rhythm that felt natural to the audience.

54

threads

262

posts

906

credits

Senior member

Rank: 4

credits
906
 Author| Published in 2025-9-24 03:14:20 | Show all floors
Some projects actually benefit from variety in delivery. Audiences appreciate predictability for learning or training material, but they also enjoy occasional live interaction to feel closer to the speaker. Offering both approaches keeps things fresh and avoids monotony. It’s a bit like watching a TV series: regular episodes give structure, but special live broadcasts add excitement and help maintain attention over time. That combination can keep people coming back consistently.
You need to log in before you can reply login | Register

Points Rule

Quick reply Top Return list